OK OK – I get it! Nic Teaming is not something new introduced in Server 2016 – the out of box networking enhancement was actually introduced with Windows Server 2012 and to be honest, nothing has really changed that much! That said I haven’t had a need to use it until a certain deployment of […]
Every couple years right around this time of year I get the wonderful task of taking care of a handful or so certificate requests that need to be created due to expiry. Not that this is an overly difficult job, nor is it very technical at all – it’s a simple thing really! That said […]
With the introduction of Windows Server 2016 we saw a third iteration of the Resilient File System (ReFS) included. Veeam was quick to jump on board with ReFS, leveraging a Microsoft provided block clone API in order to decrease your backup windows and increase your backup performance. Now, like many I was eager to see […]
Over the past few months, I’ve been involved with a pretty hefty network redesign project. For the most part the VMware environment has been excluded from this, however recently we have undergone a process in which we need to re-IP our management vmkernel ports. Now technically wise this is easy, right? Change the IP on the […]
The post Quick to the point – Clearing DNS Cache on the VCSA appeared first on mwpreston.net.
After a recent upgrade on one of our vCenter Server appliances to 6.5 U1 we began to experience issues dealing with 503 errors. Now for a TL;DR version, we were getting duplicate keys within our Postgres database, mainly within the VPX_VM_VIRTUAL_DEVICE table. After a google frenzy, I quickly saw that this issue is indeed common, […]
Remember Google Buzz? Orkut? Wave? Reader? Google Talk? Then there was Google Picasa…which became photos…so far. There are sites dedicated to what we call the Google Graveyard. This doesn’t even get into the Google Glass, Site Search, Search Appliance and others. I logged into my Google Analytics platform today and found it to be a completely different UI and UX than I have ever seen before…without warning. I used to use Google Hangouts On Air for the Virtual Design Master event every year until this year when HOA no longer works, so I have had to move to using Zoom and pushing to a Youtube Live Event.
The reason that I bring these up is that we have an optics problem with Google which may affect how many potential enterprise cloud customers choose to adopt, or rather to not adopt, Google Cloud Platform. One of the big things that traditional enterprise customers enjoy is the warm embrace of platforms that have consistency. Google has tended to have some challenges around product changes and the public face of those changes. Google most likely has lots of data backing the decision to shift or sunset a product.
Can GCP make Enterprises Greene with Envy?
Diane Greene has come over to Google by way of her most recent startup Bebop being acquired. It’s my opinion that the startup was the packaging in which they could acquire the real value, which is Diane herself. Diane has a proven past success in launching a little virtualization concept into the juggernaut that became VMware. The most recent Google Cloud Next event featured a strong presence of a new focus on the enterprise with an aim to become the number 1 public cloud provider within five years.
A quote that stood out from the event was “I actually think we have a huge advantage in our data centers, in our infrastructure, availability, security and how we automate things. We just haven’t packaged it up perfectly yet.” which highlights the challenge that Google will face. The need for many enterprises is a packaged and neatly consumable product that we know we can adopt and maintain with long support plans and clean deprecation.
There is little doubt of the ability of Google to develop incredible products which will give birth to next-generation application infrastructure that few can rival. The only doubt comes around whether enterprise audiences are going to be ready to adapt to the speed at which Google innovates their product set. If Kubernetes is any sign of how well we are leaning in, then it is very easy to see that Google can take the market on and win a significant share.
Google Cloud Platform will be a juggernaut in the public cloud realm. That is a fact which is being proven out by some major customers moving into the platform already and many more dabbling. Multi-cloud is the new cloud, so GCP will inevitably become a key player in that strategy because of it’s underlying GKE product to support Kubernetes workloads. In my opinion, the multi-cloud approach enabled by containerized workloads with an enterprise-grade scheduler is going to become the goal we should strive for.
The only question is how long it will take before we can all put our trust in one product that Google has lacked in, which is consistency.
I stumbled upon Papertrail through a Twitter Ad (hey, those things work sometimes!) and figured that I should take a quick look. Given the amount of work I’ve been doing around compliance management and deployment of distributed systems, this seems like it may be an interesting fit. Luckily, they have a free tier as well which means it’s easy to kick the tires on it before diving in with a paid commitment.
The concept seems fairly easy:
The signup process was pretty seamless. I went to the pricing page to see what the plan levels are which also has the Free Plan – Sign Up button nicely planted center of screen:
What I really like about this product is the potential to go by data ingestion rather than endpoints for licensing. Scalability is a concern with pricing for me, so knowing that the amount of aggregate data drives the price was rather comforting to me.
The free tier gets a first month with lots of data followed by a 100 MB per month follow on limit. That’s probably not too difficult to cap out at, so you can easily see that people will be drawn to the 7$ first paid tier which ups the data to 1GB of storage and 1 year of retention. Clearly, at 7 days retention for the free tier, this is meant to just give you a taste and leave you looking for more if the usability is working for you.
First Steps and the User Experience
On completion of the first form, there is a confirmation email. You are also logged in immediately and ready to roll with the simple welcome screen:
Clicking the button to get started brings you to the instruction screen complete with my favorite (read: most despised) method of deploying which is pushing a script into a sudo bash pipe.
There is an option to run each script component which is much more preferred so you can see the details of what is happening.
Once you’ve done the initial setup process, you get a quick response showing you have active events being logged:
Basic logging is one thing for the system, so the next logical step is to up the game a bit and add some application level logging which is done using the remote-rsyslog2 collector. The docs and process to deploy are available inside the Papertrail site as well:
Now that I’ve got both by system and an application (I’ve picked the Apache error log as a source location) working, I’m redirected to see the live results in my Events screen (mildly censored to protect the innocent):
You can highlight some specific events and drill down into the different context views by highlighting and clicking anywhere in the events screen:
Searching the logs is pretty simple with a search bar that uses simple structured search commands to look for content. Searches are able to be saved and stored for reporting and repetitive use.
On the first pass, this looks like a great product and is especially important for you to think about as you look at how to aggregate logs for the purpose of search and retention for security and auditing.
The key will be making sure that you clearly define the firewall and VPC rules to ensure you have access to the remote server at Papertrail and then to make sure that you keep track of the data you need to retain. I’ve literally spent 15 minutes in the app and that was from first click to live viewing of system and application logs. All that and it’s free too.
Give it a try if you’re keen and let me know your experiences or other potential products that are freely available that could do the same thing. It’s always good to share our learnings with the community!
If ChatOps is something you’ve been hearing a lot about, there is is a reason. Slack is fast becoming the de facto standard in what we are calling ChatOps. Before we go full out into making chatbots and such, the first cool use-case I explored is enabling notifications for different systems.
In order to do any notifications to Slack, you need to enable a WebHook. This is super easy but it made sense for me to give you the quick example so that you can see the flow yourself.
Setting up the Slack Webhook
First, we login to your Slack team in the web interface. From there we can open up the management view of the team to be able to get to the apps and integrations. Choose Additional Options under the settings icon:
You can also get there by using the droplets in left-hand pane and selecting Apps and Integrations from the menu:
Next, click the Manage button in the upper right portion of the screen near the team name:
Select Custom Integrations and then from there click the Incoming WebHooks option:
Choose the channel you want to post to and then click the Add Incoming WebHooks Integration button:
It’s really just that easy! You will see a results page with a bunch of documentation such as showing your WebHook URL:
Other parts of the documentation also show you how to configure some customizations and even an example cURL command to show how to do a post using the new WebHook integration:
If you go out to a command line where you have the cURL command available, you can run the example command and you should see the results right in your Slack UI:
There are many other customization options such as which avatar to use, and the specifics of the command text and such. You can get at the WebHook any time under the Incoming WebHooks area within the Slack admin UI:
Now all you have to do is configure whatever script or function you have that you want to send notifications to Slack with and you are off to the races.
Every year we are seeing more and more community contributors in the blogging ecosystem. My own work here at DiscoPosse.com and through my role at Turbonomic in the community has been so enjoyable to be a part of because of the support that I continue to receive from readers and peers in many tech communities.
Eric Siebert has been hosting the Top vBlog voting for years, and it has grown from a handful of participants to a veritable must-read list that covers every aspect of virtualization, networking, scripting, and more. This year I am honoured to be among the contributors listed and am also very proud to have Turbonomic sponsor the voting.
I just voted for my favorite blogs at vSphere-land #TopvBlog2017 Sponsored by @Turbonomic https://t.co/uXeV1wCrEQ?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss
— Eric Wright (@discoposse) June 4, 2017
My blog is listed in the voting under my name (just search for DiscoPosse) and my podcast (GC ON-Demand) is also in the running for best podcast.
I would greatly appreciate a vote if you feel that I’m providing content that is valuable, and of course, please extend your votes to all of the great IT community who surrounds us all. For those who know the work that Angelo (@AngeloLuciani), Melissa (@vMiss33) and I do with Virtual Design Master, you will know that many of the participants are also in the voting.
Your support of our amazing blogger and podcast community is always appreciated. Thank you!
Vote here for this year’s event: http://vsphere-land.com/news/voting-now-open-for-top-vblog-2017.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss
You probably dread the phrase as much as I do. We hear it all the time on a sales call or a product demo: “this is the single pane of glass for you and your team”. The problem is that I’ve been working in the industry a long time and have been using a lot of single panes of glass…at the same time. Many of my presentations have been centered around the idea that we must embrace the right tool for the right task, and not try to force everything through one proverbial funnel because the reality is that we cannot do everything with any single product.
For this reason, it’s time to embrace MSPOG: Multiple Single Panes of Glass
Many Tools, Many Tasks, One Approach
Using a unified approach to something is far more important than the requirement to using a single product to do it. I’m not saying that you should just willy nilly glue together dozens of products and accept it. What I am saying is that we have to dig into the core requirements of any task that we performa and think about things in a very Theory of Constraints (ToC) way. Before we even dive into some use-cases, think about what we are taught as architects: use the requirements to define the conceptual, logical, and then physical solution. All the while, understanding and making our decisions based on risks and constraints.
If you have a process that requires two or three different processes within it, you may be able to use a single tool for those processes. What if one of the processes is best solved with a different tool? This becomes the question of the requirements. Is it a risk if we embrace a second tool? More importantly, is it a risk or a constraint to use a single tool? This is the big question we should be asking ourselves continuously.
Imagine a virtual machine lifecycle process. We need to spawn the VM from a template, give it a network address, deploy an application into it, and then make sure it is continuously managed by a patch management and configuration management system. I know that you’re already evaluating how we should do this at the physical level by saying “use Ansible!” or “use Puppet!” or “use vRealize Automation!”. Stop and think about what the process is from end-to-end.
Our constraints on this is that we are using a VMware vSphere 6.5 hypervisor, a Windows 2016 guest, and using NGINX and a Ruby on Rails application within the guest.
- Deploy a VM from template – You can do this with any number of tools. Choose one and think about how we move forward from here
- Define IP address – We can use vRO, vRA, Puppet, Chef, or any of a number of tools. You can also even do some rudimentary PowerCLI or other automation once the machine is up and running
- Deploy your application – App deployment can be done with something like Chef, Puppet, or Ansible, as well as the native vRO and vRA with some care and feeding
- Patch management – Now we get more narrow. Most likely, you are going to want to use SCCM for this one, so this is definitely bringing another pane of glass in
- Configuration management – Provided you use SCCM because of the Windows environment, you can use that as well for configuration management…but what about the nested applications and configurations such as websites and other deeper node-specific stuff. Argh!!!
Even if you came out of the bottom of those 5 steps with just two tools, I would be thinking you may need to reevaluate because you have have overshot on the capabilities of those two tools. It is easy to see that if we start narrowing to a single pane of glass approach, that we are now jamming square blocks into round holes just to satisfy our supposed need to use a single product.
What we do need to do look for the platforms within that subset of options that has the widest and deepest set of capabilities to ensure we aren’t stacking up too many products to achieve our overall goals.
The solution: Heads up Display for your Single Pane of Glass
Automate the background and display in the foreground. We need to think more about having the proverbial single pane of glass be a visible layer on top of the real-time activity that is happening. Make your toolkit a fully-featured solution together with focus on how you can do as much as possible within each product. Also, reevaluate regularly. I can’t even count how many times i’ve been caught out by using something a specific way, only to find out that in a later version that the functionality was extended and I was using a less-desirable method, or even a deprecated method.
There is a reason that we have a mainframe at the centre of many large infrastructure shops. You wouldn’t tell them to shed their mainframe just to deploy all their data on NoSQL, right? That would be lunacy. Let’s embrace our Multiple Single Panes of Glass and learn to create better summary screens to annotate the activity. This way we also train ourselves to automate under the covers and trust the underlayers.
I, for one, welcome our Multiple Single Panes of Glass.